chat
send private message
poop lion
send

message sent

joined nov 2014
share poop lion and generate bitcoin with reference codes.
2 topics on poop lion
2 posts
+3 votes

by
poop lion
Mediation App?
1 post
+1 votes
Eldorados
17 posts by poop lion
1 post
+4 votes
Wanted: Cannabis Journalists
Piece of piss, just use a different identity for the article then use your big peeps account on Twitter, Insta or wherever to link to it.

Wanted: Cannabis Journalists
Need some quality pieces for Lb and internet publication. Show me what you got.

I'm a new member who enjoys writing and has plenty of opinions to voice on the UK's suffocating cannabis laws and how (hopefully) things are beginning to change. I'd be happy to put an article together for free when I have a bit of time.

Still looking? I've done a bunch of writing for a couple of Dutch flower growers - RQS and Zamnesia. Let me know.

I too am between jobs after being made redundant 2 weeks before lockdown! I don’t claim to be the best writer but I always give an honest account and review of all the products I buy on here, take a peek 8)

Hey there, I'm currently bvetween jobs. I can write reviews. I order what ever products are able to be sent here to Australia and beg for more. Let me know whats involve, i'm a keen bean :)

If you stil interested in writers I'm interested and have experience writing about substance misuse/use.
Drop me a line if you're interested and we'll discuss it.
Drop me a line if you're interested and we'll discuss it.

Piece of piss, just use a different identity for the article then use your big peeps account on Twitter, Insta or wherever to link to it.

the growth of cannabis journalism and media will be immense in the oncoming years within the uk
this post is very interesting
this post is very interesting

This is something I can sort you out with - I have a digital marketing company and can provide you with writing services, I only have 2 writers that are very knowledgeable in this area from both a medicinal and recreational point of view.
For writer A (very very high standard) $8/100 words
For writer b (she is really good) - $6/100 words!
Can do discounts for large pieces of work. If you are interested happy to help
For writer A (very very high standard) $8/100 words
For writer b (she is really good) - $6/100 words!
Can do discounts for large pieces of work. If you are interested happy to help

Please hit up the toddster if you are a canna writer with a place to post. And be prepared for mad ritches.

Ok.
A place to post. Time to set something up.
Ive had an idea for a crossover cannabis article for a while. Still sitting on it. Would appreciate some advice, not much else going on.
A place to post. Time to set something up.
Ive had an idea for a crossover cannabis article for a while. Still sitting on it. Would appreciate some advice, not much else going on.

I'm game, I'd love to know more if a PM is possible? I don't have much to offer in the way of selling myself, besides these wee lyrical fingertips of mine.

Pretty interested in hearing about this bud. I like to consider somewhat of an expert on cannabis but also still a student ;). I've published my fair share of blogs over the past few years around this as well as understand how to properly review a strain.
All the best! UKCF x
All the best! UKCF x

Hiya,
I'm a writer, copywriter and SEO writer, don't have cannabis content to show but have plenty of other work. Be interested to hear what you need exactly, could probably do you a sample piece. Cheers!
I'm a writer, copywriter and SEO writer, don't have cannabis content to show but have plenty of other work. Be interested to hear what you need exactly, could probably do you a sample piece. Cheers!

There are moments when emeralds are not the only green gems we like to read about. Sometimes RB's disco biscuit can get even the most hardened of tolerances seeing stars. MJ's edibles bake US. Little Biggy is a little gem where we can all get medicated, motivated and elevated. But if you want gems, you have to have diamonds. I'll smash over a review shortly :)

I write for a living (of sorts).
Quite happy to provide a spec piece on a topic of your choice.
Quite happy to provide a spec piece on a topic of your choice.

1 post
+8 votes
All dogs are fascists....
ya reckon?

All dogs are fascists....
Well I've never seen a police cat! Lol
Anyone else brought up reading the Freak Bros comics?
Anyone else brought up reading the Freak Bros comics?

Love dogs too really...just not the police ones!
They won't mind anyway...too busy biting chunks out of protesters n sniffing out stashes lol
They won't mind anyway...too busy biting chunks out of protesters n sniffing out stashes lol

I guess you never heart about kitler.

1 post
+8 votes

on
{nations}
The Rise of Nazism Looks a Lot Like Now
The 1st thing Goebels did was put a device in everyone's home.

on
{nations}
The Rise of Nazism Looks a Lot Like Now
The author looks at ordinary people's lives as Hitler shocked the country into submission as he fought the "lügenpresse" - lying media.

Yes this is an important thing to understand. People are interested in their own lives and a crazy ruler is just a form of entertainment in most people's lives. If they are effective with delivering quick economic results then they are good entertainers and are delivering some positives then fine - so why think more about this? It's demeaning to even take a fascist seriously so why bother doing so? In Germany we know why.


It is worrying that the far right parties are gaining to much support in Europe, and we should never take our eye off the ball and learn from history what can happen when you do...

Sadly we going to be finding out very soon that the majority of Americans want a semi-Fascist state the same with the uk population too


ring really reminds me of the gestapo, they rolled almost exclusively through ordinary informants. people with fucked up biases are having their day.


why do they keep designing things to look like hal? doesnt anyone remember how the movie ends?

Germany became increasingly polarized with people espousing Marxism on one side and Law and Order on the other. This is exactly how it feels in America now.

Why the dystopian views are always referred to Nazism and not to Communism? They are basically the same shit, and Communism looks much more dangerous to me, because it "succeeded" for many more years, in many more countries, and for some reason has that glamorous look to so many idiots...

AND JUST LIKE IN NAZI GERMANY YOU HAVE PEOPLE BEING APOLOGISTS BECAUSE OF "COMMUNISM". AT LEAST IT WAS ACTUALLY FUCKING COMMUNISM BACK THEN AND NOT JUST WHATEVER IS NOT ON THE RIGHT

Watching the Plot Against America on Sky and it’s easy to see how Facism takes hold. Not dissimilar to Trump’s America.

In times of economic and political strife extremists always rise, whether left or right wing...it doesn't matter, they are reactionary's. For example the liberal left intend destruction of things about history that upset them much in the same way Nazi's in Germany burned books. People need to learn from History and rarely do, the same mistakes are repeated and things somehow trundle on. 'Good times bring weak people', 'Weak people bring bad times', 'Bad times bring strong people' & 'Strong people bring good times'. The great circle of human history.

I thought it was the republicans (ie the right) in America banning certain aspects of history they don’t like.
Who are the liberal left?
Edit
I’m not trying to start an argument I’m trying to understand
Who are the liberal left?
Edit
I’m not trying to start an argument I’m trying to understand

lol it's different in different countries. A conservative in the US is different from a conservative in the UK.
As an example the BLM movement (btw I support equal rights for all races, genders etc.) have tried to expunge slavery and that part of history. Taking down statues of former slaveholders and so on won't change anything, we must remember these things happened so that they don't happen again.
Because of slow or no change for certain groups there is an attempt to accelerate that change from an evolution to a revolution. People will only be backed into a corner for so long whatever their political inclinations. Some people think they're pushing for positive change but real change is when we've learned the lesson.
As an example the BLM movement (btw I support equal rights for all races, genders etc.) have tried to expunge slavery and that part of history. Taking down statues of former slaveholders and so on won't change anything, we must remember these things happened so that they don't happen again.
Because of slow or no change for certain groups there is an attempt to accelerate that change from an evolution to a revolution. People will only be backed into a corner for so long whatever their political inclinations. Some people think they're pushing for positive change but real change is when we've learned the lesson.

Thanks for the response mate.
I still don’t get the tearing down statues of slave owners equates to trying to erase the history. Statues aren’t history they glorify the subjects for posterity.
Is it still a massive issue over there around the teaching of CRT?
I still don’t get the tearing down statues of slave owners equates to trying to erase the history. Statues aren’t history they glorify the subjects for posterity.
Is it still a massive issue over there around the teaching of CRT?

Well the statues are an example. They are subjects for posterity but they also memorialise history and certain points in history. As such they connect themselves to that history.
I basically agree with you though, they aren't the history themselves and so it shouldn't matter. It's what they represent that makes the difference.
I feel that whether right or left wing, people have an agenda and push that. Both different sides of the same coin I'd say.
Also CRT?
I basically agree with you though, they aren't the history themselves and so it shouldn't matter. It's what they represent that makes the difference.
I feel that whether right or left wing, people have an agenda and push that. Both different sides of the same coin I'd say.
Also CRT?

Thanks for the response mate.
I see statues as a way to venerate the individual and what they stand for. Cultures generally don’t put up statues of twats. So the slavers statues should all come down imo.
CRT
Critical Race Theory
I see statues as a way to venerate the individual and what they stand for. Cultures generally don’t put up statues of twats. So the slavers statues should all come down imo.
CRT
Critical Race Theory

Yeah np, I don't mind a bit of debate.
Again I do agree with the first part of what you said. Statues certainly venerate people, but also events. However cultures not putting up statues of 'twats'...well...that's a matter of perspective.
There are many examples of people that put up statues of people who are considered great or influential in their time and place. Those same people and statues are considered later, or by another group to be somehow offensive or detestable.
I'm not gona say that something like slavery in the U.S. wasn't a terrible thing, it defo was. I do think that removing something that is generally offensive to the majority should be considered. It's just that we also need to learn from these things and replace them with something that educates people about the history surrounding them so as to understand the bigger picture.
But yeah CRT, I am familiar with it...bit of a deep and complicated topic. But to answer your original question about that, yes I believe it is still something of a hot topic within education in the UK. I believe the Tories here (conservatives) said they felt CRT was biased, in other words trying to ram anti-racism down kids throats without opposing viewpoints.
This is a quote from the Equalities Minister, "Any school which teaches these elements of critical race theory, or which promotes partisan political views such as defunding the police without offering a balanced treatment of opposing views, is breaking the law".
So yeah interesting, jeez this turned into an essay XD
Again I do agree with the first part of what you said. Statues certainly venerate people, but also events. However cultures not putting up statues of 'twats'...well...that's a matter of perspective.
There are many examples of people that put up statues of people who are considered great or influential in their time and place. Those same people and statues are considered later, or by another group to be somehow offensive or detestable.
I'm not gona say that something like slavery in the U.S. wasn't a terrible thing, it defo was. I do think that removing something that is generally offensive to the majority should be considered. It's just that we also need to learn from these things and replace them with something that educates people about the history surrounding them so as to understand the bigger picture.
But yeah CRT, I am familiar with it...bit of a deep and complicated topic. But to answer your original question about that, yes I believe it is still something of a hot topic within education in the UK. I believe the Tories here (conservatives) said they felt CRT was biased, in other words trying to ram anti-racism down kids throats without opposing viewpoints.
This is a quote from the Equalities Minister, "Any school which teaches these elements of critical race theory, or which promotes partisan political views such as defunding the police without offering a balanced treatment of opposing views, is breaking the law".
So yeah interesting, jeez this turned into an essay XD

Thanks man I do appreciate your time and input.
It’s good to hear it from someone on the ground so to speak we just get fed what the media want us to hear
I do find CRT and the defund the police movements different. One is a collection of scholars etc critically evaluating how society has impacted people of all races and the defund the police is a social movement in response to innocent black people getting killed by police
Have I got that right?
It’s good to hear it from someone on the ground so to speak we just get fed what the media want us to hear
I do find CRT and the defund the police movements different. One is a collection of scholars etc critically evaluating how society has impacted people of all races and the defund the police is a social movement in response to innocent black people getting killed by police
Have I got that right?

1 post
+7 votes

on
little buggy
Is anyone else having trouble with android?
started topic

on
little buggy
Is anyone else having trouble with android?
I get dumb sizing on several pages using a galaxy edge 5

Using a pixel 3xl with chrome browser and everything seems fine to me. Although it can take a while to load pages at certain times.

I agree with the incredibly slow loading times. I've noticed it's typically on vendors pages who have alot of threads / topics to load. If you go to a newer vendor, or someone with not many threads / comments, it seems to load fine ( in my experience ).
I wonder if there's a way LB can limit the amount of threads that have to load when you first view a vendors page? And maybe add a "see more" option at the bottom to look further if you wish. But loading EVERYTHING they have ever posted seems to be the main cause of the slow loading times for me (I'm using a new android device so it's unlikely a hardware issue)
I wonder if there's a way LB can limit the amount of threads that have to load when you first view a vendors page? And maybe add a "see more" option at the bottom to look further if you wish. But loading EVERYTHING they have ever posted seems to be the main cause of the slow loading times for me (I'm using a new android device so it's unlikely a hardware issue)

Mines acting up at the moment things are really slow, Im getting restricted pages and can't send a message without it crashing on me

Everytime I go to send a message to drugs Inc. My page freezes and crashes. I was wondering if it was a known problem

Yeah I've noticed a big slowdown the past week or so. Some pages and topics won't even open and just crash the site if I try. Hard to engage with the community at the moment because of it.

i have a problem on text input for example this post, when the text box opens the way the page then zooms is a freak show, and the auto correction does not work maybe its the way its defined in the code. i'd be happy to contribute to the bounty if anyone fixes this.

This happens to me with text input but only when leaving reviews. I'm able to write this post just fine on chrome for android but I have to write reviews in my notes app and copy paste them.

1 post
+5 votes

on
{nations}
How is Nationalism Any Different from Racism?
a lot of nationalists aren't so much racists as exclusionary. they believe in a social contact that only exists amongst members. outsiders are not par…

on
{nations}
How is Nationalism Any Different from Racism?
I don't want to give preference to someone the same color as me so why should I prefer someone for being born in the same country as me (or worse they are ordained a citizen by some twat)?

Well i'm of dual heritage (my dad was from the West Indies and my mum is English) so my 'British Bulldog' avatar and profile might upset some in this thread, but yeah, i'm proud of all of my heritage.
Racism is very ugly, and you know it when you experience it.
Pride in one's heritage is completely different.
Cheers. BB
Racism is very ugly, and you know it when you experience it.
Pride in one's heritage is completely different.
Cheers. BB

Basically it derives from the same origins. There are certain laws of ethnic relations in history of humankind, such as:
1. law of percentage: lets say a black person somewhere in gothenburg or copenhagen would trigger an amused curiosity and the outpouring of sincere sympathy, however, if you "inject" immigrant workers up to the fateful threshold of 4-8 percent and you will already have a racial situation - the nature of social relationships changes, engendering ethnic tensions, global reflexes painful to describe. The more the percentage increases, the more class struggle transforms itself into racial confrontation. Basically, this percentage is sufficient to make racial discrimination appear spontaneously in people who previously believed itself wholesome and devoid of any racist sentiment.
2. The law of assimilability: If majority and the minority belong to the same large ethnic group (all are white, or all a asian), then assimilation occurs progressively. For example, Spanish or Portuguese workers despised in France not so long ago, integrated themselves into population within the space of one generation; same for descendants of corsicans and the poles during napoleonic era, same for bambara minority living in senegal. But if the ethnic and cultural gap is too big, tensions are exacerbated with time. Like African Blacks and Arabs find themselves in this situation in Europe. Coexistance basically becomes possible only in a truly Socialist state or a state that has adopted a high morality philosophy.
3. the law of distance: like two ethnic groups that are not fighting over the same living space or same market and occupy different territories separated by space can enter into normal relationships. Like that an alliance can be explained during world war 2 between hitlers germany and japan. or relationship of pretoria with israel state.
4. the law of phenotype: basically physical appearance. It would matter little tgat botha and zulu in africa have the same genotype (same genes in the chromosomes) and it would have no influence on their daily lives because their external features are so different.
Laws of class struggle according to history applies only to societies previously made homogeneous by violence. Funny, that the most modern nations actually went through this bestial struggles before (Americas, australia, new zealand, good part of asia, greenland, huge part of pacific, scandinavia, etc, etc).For example Blacks of Americas were brough over to work the land, while the indigenous races were being destroyed. So, the "more advanced" barbarious conquerors exterminated/drove out whole populations, devastated or abandoned productive forces they they simply did not know how to use. This specific law is one of my favourite... how spartan domination ended by crumbling particularly because of the great numeric weakness of their REAL citizens. Because their society consisting of spartan conquerors and lowly helots both belonged to the same large white-skinned 'race', ethnic differences became blurred and it allowed class differences appeared only in an economic sense.
Same goes for Rome and Carthage, Rwanda-Burundi, Francs and Gallo-Romans.
Have a look at the american immigration laws and how it progressed throghout 19-20 centuries. This law also gave birth to so called intra-european racism, etc.
We forget that the passage from a clan to a monolingual tribe and to ethnic group and to nationality historically was a result, a consequences of clans exogamy. It is still widely discussed by specialists. But it marked starting point of the current civilization.
Endogamy was prohibited and we, humans, just started fucking people from the outside kkk several neibourhing clans contracted marriage ties that led them eventually to speak same languages despite that their original idioms were different.
The number of clans to gather together to work a more or less powerful tribe didnt follow any rules and depended mostly on the fertility and extent of the lands occupied by the group. Thus was born nationality.
In the course of history, when two groups of people argued over a vital economic space, the slightest ethnic difference can be magnified, temporarily serving as a pretext for social and political cleavage: differences in physical appearances, colour of your passport, language, religions, morals and customs.
We forget that basically future generations must forget about the dead so that the conquering people can undergo a rebirth with an angelic consience.
Why do we almost idolise, for example, conquistadors, holy crusaders and vikings? Pillagers, rapists, murderers and worse.
Most of the things we learn and follow, most of the times, blindly, things we consider as truths and solid facts, the very foundation of our personal universes - it was predominantly build based on someones ideologies.
Books, that our kids and us read, are also written under certain circumstances, conditions, requirements, with certain motivations. Dictated by an ideology.
Sooo.... sorry for the massive message. It just questions like this trigger something inside me, something that i consciously try to understand and overcome. For before we are races or nationalities, boys or girls, gays or straight, we are humans.
Peace yo.
1. law of percentage: lets say a black person somewhere in gothenburg or copenhagen would trigger an amused curiosity and the outpouring of sincere sympathy, however, if you "inject" immigrant workers up to the fateful threshold of 4-8 percent and you will already have a racial situation - the nature of social relationships changes, engendering ethnic tensions, global reflexes painful to describe. The more the percentage increases, the more class struggle transforms itself into racial confrontation. Basically, this percentage is sufficient to make racial discrimination appear spontaneously in people who previously believed itself wholesome and devoid of any racist sentiment.
2. The law of assimilability: If majority and the minority belong to the same large ethnic group (all are white, or all a asian), then assimilation occurs progressively. For example, Spanish or Portuguese workers despised in France not so long ago, integrated themselves into population within the space of one generation; same for descendants of corsicans and the poles during napoleonic era, same for bambara minority living in senegal. But if the ethnic and cultural gap is too big, tensions are exacerbated with time. Like African Blacks and Arabs find themselves in this situation in Europe. Coexistance basically becomes possible only in a truly Socialist state or a state that has adopted a high morality philosophy.
3. the law of distance: like two ethnic groups that are not fighting over the same living space or same market and occupy different territories separated by space can enter into normal relationships. Like that an alliance can be explained during world war 2 between hitlers germany and japan. or relationship of pretoria with israel state.
4. the law of phenotype: basically physical appearance. It would matter little tgat botha and zulu in africa have the same genotype (same genes in the chromosomes) and it would have no influence on their daily lives because their external features are so different.
Laws of class struggle according to history applies only to societies previously made homogeneous by violence. Funny, that the most modern nations actually went through this bestial struggles before (Americas, australia, new zealand, good part of asia, greenland, huge part of pacific, scandinavia, etc, etc).For example Blacks of Americas were brough over to work the land, while the indigenous races were being destroyed. So, the "more advanced" barbarious conquerors exterminated/drove out whole populations, devastated or abandoned productive forces they they simply did not know how to use. This specific law is one of my favourite... how spartan domination ended by crumbling particularly because of the great numeric weakness of their REAL citizens. Because their society consisting of spartan conquerors and lowly helots both belonged to the same large white-skinned 'race', ethnic differences became blurred and it allowed class differences appeared only in an economic sense.
Same goes for Rome and Carthage, Rwanda-Burundi, Francs and Gallo-Romans.
Have a look at the american immigration laws and how it progressed throghout 19-20 centuries. This law also gave birth to so called intra-european racism, etc.
We forget that the passage from a clan to a monolingual tribe and to ethnic group and to nationality historically was a result, a consequences of clans exogamy. It is still widely discussed by specialists. But it marked starting point of the current civilization.
Endogamy was prohibited and we, humans, just started fucking people from the outside kkk several neibourhing clans contracted marriage ties that led them eventually to speak same languages despite that their original idioms were different.
The number of clans to gather together to work a more or less powerful tribe didnt follow any rules and depended mostly on the fertility and extent of the lands occupied by the group. Thus was born nationality.
In the course of history, when two groups of people argued over a vital economic space, the slightest ethnic difference can be magnified, temporarily serving as a pretext for social and political cleavage: differences in physical appearances, colour of your passport, language, religions, morals and customs.
We forget that basically future generations must forget about the dead so that the conquering people can undergo a rebirth with an angelic consience.
Why do we almost idolise, for example, conquistadors, holy crusaders and vikings? Pillagers, rapists, murderers and worse.
Most of the things we learn and follow, most of the times, blindly, things we consider as truths and solid facts, the very foundation of our personal universes - it was predominantly build based on someones ideologies.
Books, that our kids and us read, are also written under certain circumstances, conditions, requirements, with certain motivations. Dictated by an ideology.
Sooo.... sorry for the massive message. It just questions like this trigger something inside me, something that i consciously try to understand and overcome. For before we are races or nationalities, boys or girls, gays or straight, we are humans.
Peace yo.

Interesting points. I just came across this forum and will make a contribution. Meanwhile, on the topic of Scottish Nationalism, I have myself proposed Independence For England! We English (whatever that means through consensus) vote in a referendum to dissolve the union of England and Scotland. Never mind what they want, how about what we want, which may be to separate from them, along with the subject nation of Wales. We'll have our own oven ready breakfast and our own national covid death toll, while we surrender the last shreds of our integrity to the fucking Yanks and the fucking Chinese whose government leaders wouldn't make the groove as a couple of Pox Doctor's clerks.

Please dont have the idea that all Scots want independence
. Plenty are and always will be happy to be part of the union. There is more at play than just Scottish Independence, certain elements see Scottish independence as a means to help another cause. Understand that Independence of Scotland is not the endgame for a lot of SNP supporters.
. Plenty are and always will be happy to be part of the union. There is more at play than just Scottish Independence, certain elements see Scottish independence as a means to help another cause. Understand that Independence of Scotland is not the endgame for a lot of SNP supporters.

High Raskolnikov. Your post showed as a comment on mine so You're addressing me, then. I have no intention of stating anything about what Scots want. My point is that I consider an English Independence Referendum is incumbent on ourselves to determine our Englishness without the input of the other three nations. Devolution, revolution, phooey! We want ablution. Wash our hands of the lot of you. Do we? Who does? Has anyone got this underway? Sturgeon and Salmond? Something fishy about those two!

I am British not Scottish or Welsh or Irish or English but British.
So the idea of England going on its own is kind of laughable.
I prefer this great country as one nation,I have lived all over UK so I class myself as British. Ever since devolved countries we had loads of petty arguments enough of the arguments and do there jobs.
The Scottish independence route will end up like n ireland scottish people are divided straight down the middle so can see issues battle grounds comes to mind bombings etc etc just like n ireland AND its not going to happen anyway thank god.:D
Or you english going be invaded of all the people that do not want there countries independent lol.
Plus the Queen will never allow it to happen she is still the most powerful lady in this country and can override any laws in the UK set by government it is in the small print when she signed it over to the government. She has her palaces all over the UK.
She wants to send to her son to America to answer for the crimes he is guilty as fk otherwise he would have gone over and answered there questions on very serious sex crimes.
Guilty as fk he is by dodging the request of the FBI and CIA law to himself hiding behind mummy he is.
I am British loud and proud !!!
So the idea of England going on its own is kind of laughable.
I prefer this great country as one nation,I have lived all over UK so I class myself as British. Ever since devolved countries we had loads of petty arguments enough of the arguments and do there jobs.
The Scottish independence route will end up like n ireland scottish people are divided straight down the middle so can see issues battle grounds comes to mind bombings etc etc just like n ireland AND its not going to happen anyway thank god.:D
Or you english going be invaded of all the people that do not want there countries independent lol.
Plus the Queen will never allow it to happen she is still the most powerful lady in this country and can override any laws in the UK set by government it is in the small print when she signed it over to the government. She has her palaces all over the UK.
She wants to send to her son to America to answer for the crimes he is guilty as fk otherwise he would have gone over and answered there questions on very serious sex crimes.
Guilty as fk he is by dodging the request of the FBI and CIA law to himself hiding behind mummy he is.
I am British loud and proud !!!

I’m British and Scottish mate. Think it is possible to be both. I’m not interested in Independence and believe it will not happen and will be a disaster if it does. In Scotland Salmond courted a certain block vote and got it. That is what has got the snp to where they are. That and shortbread tin thinking. They will soon want to let over 14 s vote. As I said in another post, Scottish Independence is not the endgame for a lot of snp.

I wouldn’t blame the English people if they started to see things this way but we are still all better as a union and I think you know this. Sturgeon and Salmond are just typical politicians mate who lying is a big part of the job description. There has been a huge change in Scotland in my lifetime where the working class vote has moved away from labour to the snp. Labour has shot themselves in the foot so many times but also the snp politics has changed. I have been on this earth a long time and the snp have changed so much. Sturgeon is still using her bloody daily briefing up here to try to indoctrinate the nation. I’m going to stop here as I am ranting.

Not English, then. To be born an Englishman is to win first prize in the lottery of life. That life being the infliction of Imperialism on 25% of the world's population. Nothing wrong with that, was there?

Sturgeon's manifesto was just a wish list, impossible to accomplish. I don't want Scotland to leave. We may rib each other on things but I'd like to think we have each others back when things get tough. We live on the same island. Crazy to break up.

It was a joke mate but fuck, Vietnam. Is that what you are comparing Scottish Independence to?

Scotland's nationalist party don't want to exclude races, they want independence from another countries rule. It's not about racism.

lol. ok, i'll bite...
nationalism is a term for those with common interests as citizens of the same country working together for mutual benefit and/or pride.
racism is a hatred of one or more person/s where skin colour is the basis used for the defining attribute.
neither is mandatory last I heard.
nationalism is a term for those with common interests as citizens of the same country working together for mutual benefit and/or pride.
racism is a hatred of one or more person/s where skin colour is the basis used for the defining attribute.
neither is mandatory last I heard.

Proper kettle of fish this one! but I couldn’t resist throwing my 2 cents in.
Racism is an inherent belief that one group are superior to another based purely on membership to said group; that for example being white would mean that you are superior to non-whites by virtue of your whiteness. Although this is of course the most common example, it’s important to remember that racism has been perpetrated by, and against, a multitude of groups such as the current situation in China with Uighur Muslims and so on.
Nationalism is the identification with ones nation and the desire to see that nation succeed. often, but not exclusively, to the detriment of other nations.
One can be a nationalist but not a racist, but I would argue that it’s quite rare to meet a racist who is not also a nationalist.
I don’t think nationalism is always a bad thing - we saw for example at the onset of COVID-19 in Europe a large degree of nationalism as all of these countries that are part of the Schengen Agreement suddenly conveniently ignored the treaty in order to shut their borders and protect their citizens (uselessly, as it turned out) against the spread of C19.
However, nationalist sentiment needs to be controlled carefully because the downside to it could be seen, you could argue, In the Capitol siege/riots on January 6th as nationalist fervour tends to spread and morph very rapidly and almost always ends in violence and almost always ends in Fascism
Sorry for the wall of text but this is such a fascinating topic!
Racism is an inherent belief that one group are superior to another based purely on membership to said group; that for example being white would mean that you are superior to non-whites by virtue of your whiteness. Although this is of course the most common example, it’s important to remember that racism has been perpetrated by, and against, a multitude of groups such as the current situation in China with Uighur Muslims and so on.
Nationalism is the identification with ones nation and the desire to see that nation succeed. often, but not exclusively, to the detriment of other nations.
One can be a nationalist but not a racist, but I would argue that it’s quite rare to meet a racist who is not also a nationalist.
I don’t think nationalism is always a bad thing - we saw for example at the onset of COVID-19 in Europe a large degree of nationalism as all of these countries that are part of the Schengen Agreement suddenly conveniently ignored the treaty in order to shut their borders and protect their citizens (uselessly, as it turned out) against the spread of C19.
However, nationalist sentiment needs to be controlled carefully because the downside to it could be seen, you could argue, In the Capitol siege/riots on January 6th as nationalist fervour tends to spread and morph very rapidly and almost always ends in violence and almost always ends in Fascism
Sorry for the wall of text but this is such a fascinating topic!

a lot of nationalists aren't so much racists as exclusionary. they believe in a social contact that only exists amongst members. outsiders are not part of the deal.

Just like you would naturally have a preference for feeding your own family in your own home, before you concerned yourself with feeding anyone else.
This would not mean you hated other people, or didn't wish the best for them.
I think Nationalism is often confused with extreme Right wing ideologies, when it could be Left or Right really.
This would not mean you hated other people, or didn't wish the best for them.
I think Nationalism is often confused with extreme Right wing ideologies, when it could be Left or Right really.

Yes you could look into the SNPs distant past or alternatively you could look at what the Tories are doing right now as we speak under your very nose.
It is funny how a conversation about nationalism is related to the SNP when anyone with eyes can see that British nationalism is the one being pushed everywhere in Britain.
The SNP didn't spend 2 million quid on a set of blue curtains and two Union Jacks and it is not the SNP who are plastering everything with the Butcher's apron either!
It is funny how a conversation about nationalism is related to the SNP when anyone with eyes can see that British nationalism is the one being pushed everywhere in Britain.
The SNP didn't spend 2 million quid on a set of blue curtains and two Union Jacks and it is not the SNP who are plastering everything with the Butcher's apron either!

Because we can change our nationality as it’s make believe. You cannot change your DNA which is real

Racism is necessarily exclusionary. But Nationalism isn't.
In general I am wary of nationalism, but there are times when it has achieved positives.
In general I am wary of nationalism, but there are times when it has achieved positives.

There seem to be a prevailing perspective of an individualistic view on what racism is, i.e. the hatred or superiority of another race, nation, or ethnicity, however this view is overly simplistic as racism is structural and systemic and is only dependent on the individual when their actions are supported by the larger system.
One can be xenophobic, discriminatory and/or prejudiced against others from other places without it being racism if they are not the dominant race/ethnicity/or culture.
Racism = power + prejudice. That is the current understanding and definition of racism in social sciences and some dictionaries (as with Merriam Webster, which was updated two or three years ago). That is not to say that racial prejudice or discrimination is allowable or tolerable. It's not. However to quantify both types of prejudice (the one that is solely individual and the one that is supported by systemic structures) as the same thing or equivalent is false.
One is an individual opinion and has no greater repurcussions than that person's world's or actions, the other however plays into a wider narrative of oppression that reinforces the structural oppression and contributes to and reinforces societal and structural discrimination.
Nationalism is different in several ways.
Firstly, pride in ones nation does not mean an inherent prejudice or discrimination against those that come from other nations (although all too often it does manifest in such a way).
Secondly, if those expressing nationalist sentiment are not the dominant authority over said nation, then it is not racism but discrimination and prejudice as they lack the power to manifest that discrimination through institutions or on a structural scale. This type of nationalism often manifests as a resistance to colonial and imperial forces. In those cases the nationalism is not being the of an ideological superiority or innate belief in the dominance of one nation over another, but rather a resistance to such.
Therefore nationalism and racism only become the same when said nation propogates their dominance and superiority over others while simultaneously systemically oppressing other nations or supporting existing structural oppression and prejudice.
https://www.dismantlingracism.org/racism-defined.html
One can be xenophobic, discriminatory and/or prejudiced against others from other places without it being racism if they are not the dominant race/ethnicity/or culture.
Racism = power + prejudice. That is the current understanding and definition of racism in social sciences and some dictionaries (as with Merriam Webster, which was updated two or three years ago). That is not to say that racial prejudice or discrimination is allowable or tolerable. It's not. However to quantify both types of prejudice (the one that is solely individual and the one that is supported by systemic structures) as the same thing or equivalent is false.
One is an individual opinion and has no greater repurcussions than that person's world's or actions, the other however plays into a wider narrative of oppression that reinforces the structural oppression and contributes to and reinforces societal and structural discrimination.
Nationalism is different in several ways.
Firstly, pride in ones nation does not mean an inherent prejudice or discrimination against those that come from other nations (although all too often it does manifest in such a way).
Secondly, if those expressing nationalist sentiment are not the dominant authority over said nation, then it is not racism but discrimination and prejudice as they lack the power to manifest that discrimination through institutions or on a structural scale. This type of nationalism often manifests as a resistance to colonial and imperial forces. In those cases the nationalism is not being the of an ideological superiority or innate belief in the dominance of one nation over another, but rather a resistance to such.
Therefore nationalism and racism only become the same when said nation propogates their dominance and superiority over others while simultaneously systemically oppressing other nations or supporting existing structural oppression and prejudice.
https://www.dismantlingracism.org/racism-defined.html

1 post
+2 votes

on
derhyoerban
When It’s Too Late To Stop Fascism
Check your spelling it's I before E, except after making no sense whatsoever.

on
derhyoerban
When It’s Too Late To Stop Fascism
Before his suicide Austrian writer Stefan Zweig reflected on Hitler's rise. The New Yorker's George Prochnik compares it to the current US situation.

If fascism does come, it will ride in on the wings of "anti-fascist" socialist, who use racism, bigotry, and violence as thier vehicle.

1 post
+4 votes
Ronald Reagan's Prophecy
The old man was not corrupt. At the time of his election privatization was a huge meme and was working well across the world for turning state owned i…

Ronald Reagan's Prophecy


"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free."

Too bad he infringed on so many freedoms by turning police into bandits that keep what they "sieze"

The old man was not corrupt. At the time of his election privatization was a huge meme and was working well across the world for turning state owned industries into real businesses with better prices and service. Reagan thought economic incentive was the key to performance and any privatization was good.

So he was stupid and needs a break, cool why isn't that a defense for lesser crimes then? Because that don't pay.


And now a new generation is fighting for freedom from a militarized police force that Reagan enabled.

Absolutely true, the vast majority of people spend their entire lives arguing, debating and fighting over bullshit like "left vs right" and they are so caught up in it that they can't see that they aren't fighting any real issues whatsoever, just distracting themselves from the actual underlying problems!
we as a species have no enemies, the government and media are creating problems for people to divide over, because with this constant divide we will never be united enough to bring on a revolution.
we as a species have no enemies, the government and media are creating problems for people to divide over, because with this constant divide we will never be united enough to bring on a revolution.

1 post
+1 votes
UK biggaz How You Buying Your Bitcoin?
lots of atms have limited identity retrieval

UK biggaz How You Buying Your Bitcoin?
I'm looking for a new provider as Coinbase bothers me on a few levels.

Bit panda as well you can use normal bank or credit cards if u want less traceability but need photo id

Yes, Coinmama is good, once verified, it's very easy to buy Bitcoin etc for a newbie!,
Usually complete after 20 mins via CC payment. I didn't realise it was so simple..
Usually complete after 20 mins via CC payment. I didn't realise it was so simple..

BittyLicious, pretty much instant transactions and ID verification was only a few hours, site looks shady as but I've had no problems using my bank account to buy my coin there. Not sure how much more their fees are as I haven't used any other method to buy coin. Bitpanda kept refusing my ID and didn't try coinbase as I've heard they keep suspending people's accounts.

What bothers you about Coinbase if you don't mind me asking buddy? I only ask as I just started using them, lower fees than BTC.com who I currently use?

bitquick.co was good for my 1st transaction because i didnt have my ID handy and they do up to $400 without it. fast but dear.

I spend the entire week trying to set up exchanges and wallets. I initially registered with coinbase because most say they are reliable and easy to use. Coinbase somehow did not work for me. Coinmama refused my verification (no idea why). After several attempts with others I finally managed to get it all to work with Binance to buy the BTC and an Exodus wallet. I just placed my first order here so I assume that combination works ok. Phew

Agree with the guys below... BitPanda is very good. You can also try BittyLicious, the rates are a bit higher but pretty instant. SpectroCoin is another OK site.

I would have to say Bitpanda, especially for anyone new to buying Bitcoin. Check out a review here: https://littlebiggy.org/link/ZuuQR4
and a bonus 10 dollars bills for new users
and a bonus 10 dollars bills for new users

Bittylicious to Wirex wallet.
Used to use just Wirex and it was so easy but then they decided not the play ball with anything associated with Lloyds Bank.
Used to use just Wirex and it was so easy but then they decided not the play ball with anything associated with Lloyds Bank.

Ive come to really like Jaxx, took a few uses to get used to,
but it works well
GF
but it works well
GF

I am a bit hassled by Coinbase, although purchasing is easy. I use a separate wallet for my LB purchases... Never can be too careful ;)

Download the etoro app you need photo id then just buy bitcoin as a trading stock with the amount you have put on there with your debit card or linked to your paypal then it allows you to move the bitcoin to a etoro wallet and from the wallet you can send it where you want, simple as that.

1 post
+1 votes

on
Bud`n'Beer
Buying weed in Thailand
aroy!

on
Bud`n'Beer
Buying weed in Thailand

I've been in Thailand past few weeks, and the bitch of all bitches i couldn't get any weed from my usual place. Went to an island called koh samet , was hesitant to ask as other islands are abit dodgy and the weed is shit! Anyways I found the best smoke I've had here to date!! Best bar I've been in too, you can sit back relax and blaze away with the barman at the bar or alone watching the waves, I was shocked no advice about putting it in your pants watch your eyes ect.. that place is the most relaxed I've seen its literally like being in the Netherlands but 10x better!! They've got something good going on with the piggies, ,
blazing away at 2pm in the afternoon on the front of the beach, with lots of tourists old people and kids walking past is very unique in Thailand... Weed is a deep dark green from the sun, has the classic Thai smell and hashy sort of taste, strength is 8/10 it's the most strong Thai weed I've had, .. the bar is safe and they want customers it's called 'gecko bar' so if you're planning a holiday head to koh samet , besides decent weed it's got beautiful beaches and right now Chinese free! No food and bits of rubbish floating around the Ocean!
blazing away at 2pm in the afternoon on the front of the beach, with lots of tourists old people and kids walking past is very unique in Thailand... Weed is a deep dark green from the sun, has the classic Thai smell and hashy sort of taste, strength is 8/10 it's the most strong Thai weed I've had, .. the bar is safe and they want customers it's called 'gecko bar' so if you're planning a holiday head to koh samet , besides decent weed it's got beautiful beaches and right now Chinese free! No food and bits of rubbish floating around the Ocean!

You're a lot braver than i am mate! Keep a few thousand baht handy incase the local copper smells something suspicious!
Have a great holiday. Cheers. BB
Have a great holiday. Cheers. BB

Exactly mate I'll be honest I do get abit para , some places they stop you for piss test if they suspect, but you hit the nail on the head , having cash on you is way out of nearly everything in Thailand. Nice one bulldog ;)

Price is abit more than in Bangkok, around BKK you can get a kilo for under 300 pound, those little bricks are about a q and cost 1000 BAHT about 25 quid , this is the price due to the army being in control and not as many tourist,. I'm sure if busy they will sell for 800 BAHT , its high price for Thailand but at the end of the day you are paying for the protection of the bar aswel

Bangkok is abit harder to score weed safely, crystal meth is more rampant in loads of clubs and bars, Khaosan Road for weed, if you get caught in Bangkok you will need to pay top dollar better to hide it in pants if you score take no chances. Only smoke small joints on the balcony of your hotel , its best to make a friend if your there long term, and blaze in your condo. No matter where you are in Thailand reggae bars are 90% safe to ask ,The islands are the place ,more care needed in Phuket or around Pattaya but in general apart from them 2 you ain't gonna see no police, as opposed to Bangkok where it's full of mean looking bastards itching to nick you

1 post
+6 votes

on
pk2
What if we did a Secret Santa on LB?
Yes but fresh ones come in every day

on
pk2
What if we did a Secret Santa on LB?
I guess there's some complications but isn't overcoming that shit what we are all about here?

1 post
+4 votes

on
{cannabis}
UK Legalisation
AMen bigga fuck dem we don't need their permission, and if this shit here reminds me things can work more civil without them then thats a bonus.

on
{cannabis}
UK Legalisation
What's everyone's opinion on the legalization of cannabis in the UK..
We've seen major states in the US over the past few years and just across the shore in Ireland that's legalised for medicinal and some recreational..
My question is.. when will it happen here in the UK? What's everyone's opinion..
We've seen major states in the US over the past few years and just across the shore in Ireland that's legalised for medicinal and some recreational..
My question is.. when will it happen here in the UK? What's everyone's opinion..

Legalisation eh? No thanks! Not for me anyway. To be fair I’m about a thousand years old so I’ve a different perspective to the majority, maybe.
When I look back over the last few decades of living this obsession, most of the fun was related to the chase.
Doing your runnings and taking little risks is a great way to release an adrenaline spike. That’s a substance we all crave like no other!
I like being a bit edgy(whilst doing no real harm). I downright love breaking an unfair and unjust law!
I like it that all the wankers disapprove of me! If they legalise it, said wankers will start doing it. They’ll still hate me and I them, only difference is I’ll have lost the smug satisfaction of knowing what they’re missing and enjoying my individuality.
My closest friendships have been made and proven in our collective efforts to maintain a supply of something nice. Like bands of brothers. Celebrating success together, sharing the fun and occasional disasters.
No fun in walking over the shops is there? What about work and driving? I mean you’ve got to watch what you do on social media, how do you think you’re boss etc will react to open drug use?
It’ll still be drugs remember. Naagh, keep it on the low I say. I hope they never legalise it.
It ain’t gonna be nearly as much fun. It isn’t going to be any cheaper. Quality will still be hit and miss. The government will have a field day. But most of all as previously stated all the wankers will start doing it.
Medical? Yes. Small medical grows? Yes. Full on recreational legalisation? Not for me thanks!
When I look back over the last few decades of living this obsession, most of the fun was related to the chase.
Doing your runnings and taking little risks is a great way to release an adrenaline spike. That’s a substance we all crave like no other!
I like being a bit edgy(whilst doing no real harm). I downright love breaking an unfair and unjust law!
I like it that all the wankers disapprove of me! If they legalise it, said wankers will start doing it. They’ll still hate me and I them, only difference is I’ll have lost the smug satisfaction of knowing what they’re missing and enjoying my individuality.
My closest friendships have been made and proven in our collective efforts to maintain a supply of something nice. Like bands of brothers. Celebrating success together, sharing the fun and occasional disasters.
No fun in walking over the shops is there? What about work and driving? I mean you’ve got to watch what you do on social media, how do you think you’re boss etc will react to open drug use?
It’ll still be drugs remember. Naagh, keep it on the low I say. I hope they never legalise it.
It ain’t gonna be nearly as much fun. It isn’t going to be any cheaper. Quality will still be hit and miss. The government will have a field day. But most of all as previously stated all the wankers will start doing it.
Medical? Yes. Small medical grows? Yes. Full on recreational legalisation? Not for me thanks!

AMen bigga fuck dem we don't need their permission, and if this shit here reminds me things can work more civil without them then thats a bonus.

Dead on mate, its a lose-lose I’m convinced. A lot of people will get very rich(not us obviously). Cynical business making all the decisions regarding the thing we all love and have nurtured together as a community. I’m open to a single good reason for it, I haven’t heard anything compelling yet.
I think personally it’s a case of people being careful what they wish for. In case we get it.
Government and legislators won’t understand the minutiae and we’ll end up choosing between red, blue or silver top! They’ll want to regulate and standardise and make everything”safe” for the idiots. They’ll all start sueing each other over who invented white widow or whatever.
Run away as fast as we can. This time we need to hide more carefully as well. We’re doing ok without them people.
Peace
I think personally it’s a case of people being careful what they wish for. In case we get it.
Government and legislators won’t understand the minutiae and we’ll end up choosing between red, blue or silver top! They’ll want to regulate and standardise and make everything”safe” for the idiots. They’ll all start sueing each other over who invented white widow or whatever.
Run away as fast as we can. This time we need to hide more carefully as well. We’re doing ok without them people.
Peace

Good reasons for legalisation/regulation:
1. Easy access for disabled/medical patients.
2. Ban the use of contaminants/unsafe fertilizers. Over the years we've seen foliar feeds that contain latex polymers. Liquid sugar/finely ground glass/cornflour/spice and similar chemicals sprayed onto plants. Not to mention hash made of henna/hay/oil/any old shit and the recent problems with carts.
3. Less paranoia.
4. Tax revenue that can be directed into public services.
5. Boost to economy, boost to tourism.
6. An end to kids getting a criminal record for something that shouldn't be a crime.
7. Gradual removal of social stigma.
8. Walking over the shop may not be fun, but it's very convenient.
9. A chance for cottage industries to start competing and growing in a legal marketplace.
10. A raising of standards - I'm told Californian mid-shelf is better than UK top shelf.
11. A much needed counter-balance to the (frankly depraved and embarrassing) UK binge drinking culture, hopefully leading to a more relaxed, European style cafe culture.
12. A more social cannabis scene. With coffeeshops and dispensaries people will have a reason to go out and mix more. An end to the stereotype of the isolated stoner.
I know most of us here are okay now. But what about the youngsters getting sold rubbish? The elderly and disabled going without medicine?
All this balanced against the chance to feel like a rebel and a load of running around. With respect, I'd take legalisation and regulation any day.
1. Easy access for disabled/medical patients.
2. Ban the use of contaminants/unsafe fertilizers. Over the years we've seen foliar feeds that contain latex polymers. Liquid sugar/finely ground glass/cornflour/spice and similar chemicals sprayed onto plants. Not to mention hash made of henna/hay/oil/any old shit and the recent problems with carts.
3. Less paranoia.
4. Tax revenue that can be directed into public services.
5. Boost to economy, boost to tourism.
6. An end to kids getting a criminal record for something that shouldn't be a crime.
7. Gradual removal of social stigma.
8. Walking over the shop may not be fun, but it's very convenient.
9. A chance for cottage industries to start competing and growing in a legal marketplace.
10. A raising of standards - I'm told Californian mid-shelf is better than UK top shelf.
11. A much needed counter-balance to the (frankly depraved and embarrassing) UK binge drinking culture, hopefully leading to a more relaxed, European style cafe culture.
12. A more social cannabis scene. With coffeeshops and dispensaries people will have a reason to go out and mix more. An end to the stereotype of the isolated stoner.
I know most of us here are okay now. But what about the youngsters getting sold rubbish? The elderly and disabled going without medicine?
All this balanced against the chance to feel like a rebel and a load of running around. With respect, I'd take legalisation and regulation any day.

True but legalisation will make this community think beyond cannabis and that's a good thing too.

The uk drugs minster needs replaced for a start, she wont discuss the topic of legalisation even though her husbands involved in cultivation of medical in the uk. Its absurd. I think we're a good few years away yet.

Trouble is that all the old fogeys in the house of lords are still all "reefer madness" about it. Until they change their minds or die off and get replaced by younger lords, it'll never happen. I believe medical thc will eventually become a viable medicine. But it will be administered as some kind of extract probably taken as a pill or liquid instead of a good old fashioned spliff.

I don't know...if public opinion shifts to the extent a majority of MPs got on board I doubt the Lords would stand in the way.
Now Canada and a large portion of the US has legalised, and much more is becoming known about the plant and its relative safety & even benefits, I would think it's just a matter of time before some form of legalisation comes to Europe, and the UK. If we had the rates of use of US & Canada maybe it'd be happening already but there's less users and a more conservative view overall about it I'd say, so it'll take longer but it will happen
Now Canada and a large portion of the US has legalised, and much more is becoming known about the plant and its relative safety & even benefits, I would think it's just a matter of time before some form of legalisation comes to Europe, and the UK. If we had the rates of use of US & Canada maybe it'd be happening already but there's less users and a more conservative view overall about it I'd say, so it'll take longer but it will happen

I do hope so. And yeah you're probably right. When enough people stand up and say it needs doing, and mps get behind it. They won't have a choice. But yeah it'll probably take a long time. In the meantime I'll continue to tend to my crops on the quiet. Waiting patiently for the day I can come out of the shadows.

To be honest imo we only need decriminalization. That's what has happened in Barcelona. There is a UN law that states you are allowed member only, non profit clubs once that happens.
All above board tax and wage paying businesses.
Notice someone say May us dead against drugs, I don't think thatthat's true as her husband Philip has a great business selling it to the NHS. Only reason I can think is because they want control over it is either for personal profit or they don't think us Plebs can be trusted to run sensible above board businesses.
All above board tax and wage paying businesses.
Notice someone say May us dead against drugs, I don't think thatthat's true as her husband Philip has a great business selling it to the NHS. Only reason I can think is because they want control over it is either for personal profit or they don't think us Plebs can be trusted to run sensible above board businesses.


our day will come as they are losing the argument that it is a dangerous drug... legalise it and I shall advertise it... remember living in mallorca in the eighties where you could sit down in any cafe/bar and as long as you didn't have more than 25 grams, you could place it openly on your table and smoke the day away... you would often see the local poilce in full uniform lighting up a fat one...

1 post
+15 votes

on
{modafinil}
Modafinil vs. Armodafinil? I'm confused.
I think armodafinil is a little less tweaky than moda which is considerably less tweaky than adderall.

on
{modafinil}
Modafinil vs. Armodafinil? I'm confused.
short answer -> armodafinil has a quicker onset, requires a smaller dosage, lasts a little longer, and usually costs a bit more than modafinil.
long answer -> modafinil contains both R and the S enantiomers (mirror images) of the modafinil molecule. the mixture of both R and S enantiomers is said to be “racemic” because modafinil contains R and S modafinil in equal proportions.
in contrast, armodafinil contains only one enantiomer R-modafinil and is therefore said to be “enantiopure” (containing only a single enantiomer).
armodafinil thus can be thought of as a more purified form of modafinil.
my suggestion is to purchase a combo pack and try both (during different weeks, with a break in between), keeping a log. for most it is a very subjective choice.
long answer -> modafinil contains both R and the S enantiomers (mirror images) of the modafinil molecule. the mixture of both R and S enantiomers is said to be “racemic” because modafinil contains R and S modafinil in equal proportions.
in contrast, armodafinil contains only one enantiomer R-modafinil and is therefore said to be “enantiopure” (containing only a single enantiomer).
armodafinil thus can be thought of as a more purified form of modafinil.
my suggestion is to purchase a combo pack and try both (during different weeks, with a break in between), keeping a log. for most it is a very subjective choice.

I think armodafinil is a little less tweaky than moda which is considerably less tweaky than adderall.

I can understand people calling it paranoia but when hundreds/thousands of people have this suspicion (and all around the same time), that definitely adds some weight to the claims. I don't think anyone is questioning Sun or Hab themselves, even though we all know that their QC regulations are way more laxed than the western world. The effects people are describing are consistent with one another and are consistent with the waves of threads that have popped up in the past in regards to this topic. All that aside, I am one who DO believe there are bad batches from time to time. I've eliminated or reduced any variables and taken one from the questionable batch one day and one from a batch that Ive taken before and had consistent results with. Let me tell you, the difference is night and day. Obviously tolerance, stomach contents, caffein intake, etc can change the effects drastically but on numerous occasions I've done this comparison minimizing any variables and the questionable batch is consistently shit. Why there would even be counterfeits of a medication that is already super chaeap from the source? No clue. Not certain about anything other than I know there are bad batches or counterfeits in circulation. I'm 100% certain. In fact, I even found small differences in the foil strips. Questionable batch foil is ever so slightly thicker and less pliable. It's also heavier on a gram scale. Stamp of batch number and info is a different ink because it fades on areas inconsistently whereas the known good package stamp fades evenly and never to a point where you can't read the text. I'm willing to send this sample to someone to put next to their own known good product to see that there are differences in the packaging if you look closely. Weigh the strip and weigh a known good sample. I don't have one of this thickness gauges that measure the thickness of things accurately but I'm willing to bet that it's thicker than legit moda. I imagine a huge manufacturer like Sun uses manufacturing processes that ensures all the finished packaging is the same. I can understand small variations in the manufacturing process but not the thickness of the foil or ink used. I'll eventually study these different batches enough to come up with a list of tell-tale signs of bunk moda.i do plan on taking different batches samples to someone who can test the ink and someone who knows the manufacturering processes of foil strips. It might look like I'm just imagining things but until y

If it were here I would tend to trust it a lot more. The afinil subreddit has always been moderated corruptly as hell. The current theme is discrediting modafinil to move people to adrafinil powder over at the nootropics sites.

This has changed. r/afinil has cleaned up its act considerably. But yes it was even worse than that and still may be but I don't see it.

True this, if you look at the industry it seems very possible that bad batches occur and that these would make their way into the hands of shady (no offense rex, shady like em :) exporters.

1 post
+1 votes

on
{buy help}
Forgot password
If you have the email address saved on that account, yes. Try the {lb help} chat bot.
1 post
+2 votes

on
Mikeoxlong
After tangerine dream? Or if anyone's tried it, be good to know how dank it is??
Is it a hybrid that yer after?
0
1 post
+0 votes
raceyT - jews discussion
How do you feel about it's use as an adjective?