THE GIVEAWAY IS NOW CLOSED

The BTC price at 6 PM Berlin time on April 19, 2026 closed at $74,822.

And the two winners are...
🥇 Cookiecutter — $74,877.83 (only $56 off!)
🥈 Diceretro — $74,966

Congratulations to both of you! Please send us a message to claim your prize and choose whatever you'd like from the store.

Also, a reminder to everyone with outstanding or missing orders, we are fully back on track (a bit later than announced) and all orders will be shipped out without further delay. If you haven't heard from us yet, you will soon.

Thank you to everyone who took part and submitted a guess 🙏

You should act first, then give the good news. Otherwise it's frustrating.

75,300
18/04/26

$74,877,83
19/04/08:42 GMT
Hopefully I'm not too late :)

$75,666
18/04/26 23:03 GMT

$75385,67
18/4/26

$75,464.70 / £55,800.58 (please ignore my other comment)

55,800.58

$77,357
18/4/26
14:17
Danke NC249

$ 76,130
18/4/26
@ 13:21

$74,298
18-04-26
🙏🙏🙏

$75,680 - 18/4 - Thanks. Good to see you're still at it and in business NC249. Always provided goodness.

$75,684 18/04 thanks 🤞🏼

$ 76,644 on 18/04 at 11:39

$78,475
17/4/26
22.29

$75.141.👍 17/4/2026. @19.11.

$76,200
17/4/26 20:00

$76,500
Thanks
17/4/26 11:50AM

$74,966 - thanks!

75.594$
17/04/2026

73,500$

Entry submitted at 17/04/2026 @ 08:06 BST

$75000

$75600

Glad you sorted it.

7599

Finally some good news. Hopefully I will receive the order I put 3 weeks ago...
All the best for you guys.

$74105

$77,100
16/04/2026

$74 000 16/04/2026

$73,700
16/04/2026

Heute gibt's kostenloses Gras!

76,500

Cheers guys welcome back, good luck everybody!

$75,888.

Good stuff

$78,300

Gd luck everybody

Hallo, all ist gut, we're still glad you're here!

Danke for the competition, I guess $75420, good luck folks!

A decent explanation. So you relied on someone 'reliable' and now they're gone, is how I read this...?

indeed, people do change over time :-)

Hi NC

As they say in the UK "shit happens".

At least you're owning it and making things right 👍

Thanks for running a comp, what is the deadline for submitting an entry?

A me di sicuro 🤣❣️🤤

me too! can they get us some?

interesting request, definitely a rare strain to come across nowadays.

any nice, strong sativa would be nice tbh

Would love some sativa leaning skunk hybrids (green crack, lemon skunk, sour tangie etc.) or any non-haze sativas really. Also would be amazing if you could ever source some of those dimitri vape pens that occasionally pop up on LB.

Old quality pollen or some Afghan black hash..I miss that taste of real smoke, real as I have always known it..

Oldskool pollen. Just lovely normal hash!!♡

Can you add thc gummies please. Magic mushrooms would also be a good idea

Some edibles would be great

got some syrup stocked now.

Some double or triple filtered hash 👌

Can't send you a message for some reason?

Live Resin , Shatter , Crumble , Diamonds. All i need in EU :) Hash rosin would be also nice, but in terms of price i prefer concentrates than solventless.. There would be also nice some diamonds liquid carts / vapes and as i saw you offered papers ->> dmt in 510 carts would be also good to think about. Im simple man, when you will load list by resin, i will be there immediately with my order...😂🍻

More sativa strain please 🥺

new haze curing currently!

Dov'è la foschia

we didn't list it on here, as not enough people responded to the post.

4 me AK haze
🙏

Definitely! Very hard to source on here for us EU customers!

Yes I would definitely be interested as they are very hard to find

I'd be interested as been searching for a decent vape which isn't distillate based.

List them, I'll try them and buy them regularly if they're decent.

You know it's Rosin right? At least 5-6 times the price of distillate, if not more.

sadly, you are completely right.

This will be the first batch we receive, and sadly it's not a big batch, but should the vapes get good feedback we will try and source them for cheaper.

We will list one vape for 50$ and 2 vapes for 45$ each.

That's for .5g? That's pretty reasonable to be fair

yes, .5g

Yeah I do, but I'm in a position where I couldn't care less about the price, quality of the product is everything to me personally.

I really can't agree with u cleanup borg ... either the dispute algorithm works or not .. showing raised disputes that have been paid 100% in my favour (dispute algorithm) .. often against what turns out to be a fraud suspected vendor .. how will that benefit a vendor seeing I have 1.4% disputes instead of the previous 0 .. so the vendor now's sees what could be mistaken for a buyer who tries it on with disputes and not an honest buyer who was occasionally ripped off by an unscrupulous vendor 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

i cant seem to comment on the main post for some reason lol.

i have had nightmares with disputes. i got hit with wave after wave of scammers all from the same area and all sharing some other common patterns last summer. zero support from LB.

Also had issues at my end with post not going out last year too but managed to fix the issue. losts of disputes but all resolved in that case.

however i dont know if you know this but LB sometimes pays out the dispute even if you appear to have won. in that case Transaxe holds a debt against your name and can increase fees to recoup the decision they made whenever they like.

in the last 6 months i have only had one dispute and that was from someone that didnt know what to do when i didnt respond to their message for longer than 2 hours. minor issue and instantly fixed.

the other issue is buyers raising disputes and then dissapearing. vendor money locked up and dispute window closes with ignored messages from LB


a refund option would be good too for once a parcel has been sent but that doesnt seem to be in the roadmap. ive even been advised to let a dipute time out in order to refund and still recieved a bad mark.

i love LB but there is definitly room to improve.

What a joke we've gone above and beyond to hold zero disputes in 5+ years and this does nothing beneficial again your neglecting your responsibilities if a buyer is consistently raising disputes and evading public scrutiny their page should be marked with "fraud suspected" as you have done in the past, instead buyers and sellers that pride themselves on a clean dispute record have just been told tough luck because your too lazy to catch people abusing your already flawed system once again massive failure by the borgs at LB and we hope you will revert this horrible decision.

Also it now shows 0.1% at the top of our page and 0% at the bottom this update does nothing beneficial its just a confusing mess admit you missed the mark with this one and please listen to all of us this is clearly an unpopular change you just need to read every response to your post.

shouldn't it be on disputes finalised....

How would that solve the problem they are describing? Make a dispute to shake down a seller, get your reward and cancel the dispute. Rinse and repeat basically.

Absolutely. Only if a refund is made by the system.

Rogue buyers open endless new accounts over which there is no restriction. They really do not have to care about their dispute percentage as these are throwaway accounts. You recently posted that you would penalise any vendors who refused to deal with new accounts. I understand that the algorithm may not pay out fully to a new buyer, but that doesn’t mean they don’t get paid.

The very best Biggas i.e. those with the most buys will statistically end up with more disputes simply because they buy the most product or are you actively trying to dissuade them from using a system that has significant value and is there to protect them? Either that or they are penalised for trying new vendors where the risk is higher. Why would you want to make your best customers look worse?

Please think again, Queen of the Borgs

5/3/26

I agree with many of the comments here that the borgs missed the mark with this update and have got it wrong. I'm personally frustrated that after excellent conduct for years that now I have a dispute rating for a resolved dispute over Xmas where a seller didn't send the parcel nor respond to messages. The dispute was resolved between the seller and me and the system at the time assured us that no black mark was made on reputations. I'm sure many people will now have disputes showing. This doesn't appear to help anyone.

I have to agree with the others it's makes attacks on vendors much easier. It takes long time and hard work to build a shop but anyone can create countless buyer accounts to use and burn.

Wouldn't that problem have existed already? Only now they lose the leverage of controlling the dispute redecoration.

Partially, but now the seller gets the bad points even if they resolved every single dispute. Loosing both money (in case of refund/replacement) and now also loosing reputation.

The sellers are the backbone of this site, I hope they get more rights on here soon lol.

Fair play vendors u deal with a lot of hurdles most would not bother.

My actual account now has 3.3 percent disputed when it was zero beforehand, i got scammed in 2022 & had to open a dispute once to hear back from a seller and get a resolution lol; yeah im not a fan nobody asked for this

I shop with the select few anyways on here; why not give me an option to release funds from escrow when ive got it i'm always happy with the cat and such

and sorry to do this here when can i get permission to message people/leave order notes on my main account you left me on read twice man

Listen to the community please

What about if the seller has obviously left the website? I offer the current example of NFUSED. This seller has disappeared with multiple orders undelivered. His current dispute rate on current orders is 6.8% but still does not have a fraud warning on the account. Because he has behaved in such a manner, anyone who wants their fraudulently taken money back, has to take a reputational hit. How can that be fair and equal?

Fair enough, but this just means its best to stick to established vendors from here on out.

If a customer raises a dispute by accident, then resolves it. The seller is now punished. They have a higher dispute count on the profile.

Higher dispute count % is bad for sellers.

But the buyer would be punished too and the dispute count is going to be proportionally even higher for a buyer.

There are a lot more buyers than there are sellers. Punishment % total for seller is higher.

this still doesn’t explain the discrepancies between the dispute percentage shown on a profile versus the reviews

understand the points made as some DNMs follow the method of showing

Total Disputes
Disputes Won and Lost

but as of present this is just a tiny tweak that will cause confusion in my view, I may be wrong

There are no disputes won and lost.

Thanks for the feedback loves, we are going to have another, much more complete go at this.

Please do note this is already resulting in a decrease in dispute blackmail, something you honest biggaz are happily blind to and the primary motivation for the change in display.

Again, all knickers should remain wrinkle-free in the meantime, the change effects everyone and your operative reputation remains intact.

So can we get a straight answer will those with a perfect 0% score see that restored?

Most may be blind to a small amount of users using dispute blackmail but as we stated that is your job to police, the solution is not to punish every user by tarnishing their score to stop bad actors, you have a "fraud suspected" label so log in more frequently and start labelling bad actors accordingly that is the only way to have a complete go at this, LB lost a lot of users when you decided it was best to have an algorithmic dispute resolution instead of someone manually reviewing every case and I'm guessing this "update" has done the same as the next day you had a user asking how to close their account on your page. If you don't want to log in as much and do your job maybe hire another borg because these soulless "updates" are what's ruining the site, guaranteed if you revert the dispute scores to the old way announce your going to be manually reviewing all disputes instead of a stupid algorithm and you'll see the positivity in the comments or continue with a more complete version when there is already so much upset and confusion with the first change....

Thanks for acknowledging it's not gone perfectly. Could new users not be on a probationary account level or something? Something that'd limit any damage they could do? Would that work?