Absolutely! Give those scientists free reign for a bit of research and in no time we will have perfected the technique and could potentially implement some of those cool sci-fi biological modifications whist we were at it! Cool, hey? Unfortunately however, the science is prohibitively expensive for anyone other than a 'State level' actor, and since all human genome research, replication and modification is massively restricted on ethical grounds across the Scientific community, nobody really bothers.
But the main reason, the real kicker for human cloning research is that unfortunately poignant question that pops up to disrupt the narrative flow of every great funding bid presentation.
That one that really knocks the enthusiasm out of those who grew up dreaming of having an army of personal replicant slaves at their bidding ...
'Why'?
Seriously, why?
The problem is that there is no purpose to even consider the prospect other than idle curiosity.
Two identical genomes in two identical foetuses will develop, grow, learn, mature and diverge in ways exactly alike those seen in identical twins who will often exhibit startling personality differences between 'identical' DNA.
But that is the other issue:
DNA expression in our fellow mammals has plasticity. It changes constantly in relation to our experiences and lifestyle choices from gestation until death. So a clone is no different than an identical twin, really. Not particularly useful unless you make a spare for everyone at birth and store them unconscious in a fridge until you need a bone marrow donation in your forties, by which time I'm sure it would be past its best and have freezer burn. (Plus the storage bill would be huge)!
So
-Not practical for spare parts, really. Ethics, rights, ect
-Not practical as personal minions due to that issue of free will
-Take the same time as normal humans to grow. Why bother?
-Perfect tissue match? Gotta grow it first
- Medical Research? Ethical issues again, and if you don't mind those you probably would not mind just researching on poor people like everyone else did.
Anyway, TL/DR
We can with a bit of effort, but can't find a reason to bother other to say 'look what I did' and we already got that headline with human embryos and sheep.
But the main reason, the real kicker for human cloning research is that unfortunately poignant question that pops up to disrupt the narrative flow of every great funding bid presentation.
That one that really knocks the enthusiasm out of those who grew up dreaming of having an army of personal replicant slaves at their bidding ...
'Why'?
Seriously, why?
The problem is that there is no purpose to even consider the prospect other than idle curiosity.
Two identical genomes in two identical foetuses will develop, grow, learn, mature and diverge in ways exactly alike those seen in identical twins who will often exhibit startling personality differences between 'identical' DNA.
But that is the other issue:
DNA expression in our fellow mammals has plasticity. It changes constantly in relation to our experiences and lifestyle choices from gestation until death. So a clone is no different than an identical twin, really. Not particularly useful unless you make a spare for everyone at birth and store them unconscious in a fridge until you need a bone marrow donation in your forties, by which time I'm sure it would be past its best and have freezer burn. (Plus the storage bill would be huge)!
So
-Not practical for spare parts, really. Ethics, rights, ect
-Not practical as personal minions due to that issue of free will
-Take the same time as normal humans to grow. Why bother?
-Perfect tissue match? Gotta grow it first
- Medical Research? Ethical issues again, and if you don't mind those you probably would not mind just researching on poor people like everyone else did.
Anyway, TL/DR
We can with a bit of effort, but can't find a reason to bother other to say 'look what I did' and we already got that headline with human embryos and sheep.

